For the first time in recorded
history (and perhaps as long as 3 million years), the CO2
concentration in the atmosphere has been measured at greater than 400 parts per
million (ppm). It is points like this, of seemingly minor immediate
significance, that we may look back on as the road signs on our journey of
stupidity.
Signs that we may have heeded, and
didn’t.
I am increasingly impacted by the
apparent indifference to climate change (or anthropogenic global warming - AGW)
that I observe in my engineering colleagues, precisely because ours is a
profession supposedly founded on science.
To me it is quite straightforward:
1.
Do you believe in science?
Yes:
Please proceed.
No:
Either go back to school or join your nearest Conservative party. An engineer
who does not believe in science really has no business being an engineer:
scientific inquiry is the basis of engineering application.
2. Do you believe climate science is
good science?
Yes:
Please proceed.
No:
Explain why the G8 science academies and all institutions not aligned with the
fossil fuel industry agree that it is good science - in short, explain why the
global consensus is wrong. Then go out and publish, in peer reviewed journals,
good science about the climate to improve our broad understanding.
3. Do you understand the implications
of the global consensus on AGW?
Yes:
Please proceed.
No:
go and read the IPCC 4th assessment report (the 5th is due imminently). Also
refer to Nature Geoscience, NOAA or NASA for further information. In summary,
AGW is the greatest challenge of our age and poses a threat to human prosperity
and existence at a scale matched only, perhaps, by the threat of nuclear
warfare.
4. If you've got this far, are you
doing everything in your power to
mitigate and adapt to the threats of AGW?
Because if you believe the science,
and understand the implications, there is no condoning an approach which does
not prioritise mitigation and adaptation as the absolute highest priority in
every decision we make.
History will judge our engineers for
inaction nearly as harshly as it will judge our politicians. Short-term
self-interest will not prove an acceptable excuse.
And yet I have no doubt that you can find climate denialist and conspiracy theorist engineers all around. I know I've encountered some in WSP (RSA). Incredible to believe.
ReplyDeleteIt's not just a case of finding the odd skeptic or denier - my impression is that the majority of engineers, certainly in the built environment, fall into this category... And in my view, it's unforgivable.
ReplyDeleteI liked Ian Dunlop's document regarding these issues. It's written from the Australian point of view and rather straightforward. #86 here: http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate_Committees?url=ec_ctte/extreme_weather/submissions.htm
ReplyDelete